By Jack Arnold
In the lead-up to the Farrer by-election on 9 May 2026, Pauline Hanson’s One Nation party has announced substantial private donations totaling at least $2 million. The announcement, made via social media during the pre-polling period, has intensified debate about the party’s funding sources and its ability to represent regional communities long served by the National Party.
Hanson unveiled the donations alongside the gifting of a new Cirrus G7 private plane, which she described enthusiastically as “sexy,” “fast,” and “amazing” in a video post. She stated the aircraft would help the party campaign more effectively across regional areas, allowing visits to more towns without relying on commercial flights or taxpayer resources. The party emphasized that the plane would not be used for “joy rides.”
Breakdown of the Donations
• $1 million from stockbroker Angus Aitken and his wife Sarah Aitken. Hanson praised them as “two wonderful, patriotic Australians” whose “faith and investment” in One Nation would support the party’s broader federal campaign efforts, including candidates such as Malcolm Roberts, Sean Bell, Tyron Whitten, and former Nationals MP Barnaby Joyce. Angus Aitken has a history of donating to conservative causes, including $200,000 to the right-leaning campaign group Advance and $24,000 to the Liberal Party.
• $500,000 each from Ian Plimer (executive director of Hancock Energy) and Adam Giles (head of Hancock Agriculture and former Northern Territory chief minister). Both men are senior executives at companies owned by Australia’s richest person, Gina Rinehart. In a accompanying video, the pair presented oversized novelty cheques, with Giles describing the donation as “providing the wings for a movement that refuses to let the heart of this country be silenced.” Plimer, a prominent geologist and climate sceptic, has long been associated with Rinehart’s business interests.
The timing is notable: the donations were publicized just days before polling in the rural New South Wales seat of Farrer, which has been held by the Liberals/Nationals for decades until the resignation of former Opposition Leader Sussan Ley. One Nation’s candidate, David Farley, is contesting the seat against independent Michelle Milthorpe and others in what is shaping up as a contest for disaffected regional voters.
Questions of Influence and “Mouthpiece” Claims
Critics argue that such large contributions from wealthy individuals and Rinehart-linked executives reinforce the view that One Nation functions as a vehicle for right-wing billionaire interests rather than a genuine grassroots voice for “forgotten” Australians. They question whether Plimer and Giles donated personal funds or whether the contributions effectively represent indirect support from Hancock Prospecting entities.
Rinehart has a documented history of supporting conservative and right-leaning causes, including previous backing for One Nation figures and related groups. Hanson has frequently flown on aircraft associated with Rinehart’s companies in the past, though the new Cirrus G7 is presented as a distinct donation/gift to the party.
Supporters of One Nation counter that political parties across the spectrum rely on private donations to operate, especially smaller parties challenging the major duopoly. They point out that One Nation also receives public funding based on electoral performance and that transparent, declared donations from Australian citizens (even wealthy ones) are legal and preferable to undisclosed “dark money” or union-backed funding for other parties. Hanson has framed the support as coming from “patriotic Australians” who believe in the party’s agenda of lower cost of living, stronger borders, affordable energy, and prioritizing regional infrastructure.
Infrastructure and Regional Representation
A core question remains for voters in Farrer and similar electorates: How will One Nation translate this financial backing into tangible improvements in government services and infrastructure for communities that feel neglected by successive National and Liberal MPs?
One Nation’s platform typically emphasises practical regional issues – roads, water security, affordable power, and opposition to policies perceived as harming farmers and rural industries (such as certain climate or net-zero mandates). Critics, however, suggest that heavy reliance on mining and agribusiness-linked donors could create conflicts when those same industries have interests that sometimes diverge from everyday community needs, such as environmental regulations, water allocation, or economic diversification.
Whether the donations represent genuine ideological alignment or strategic investment in a rising populist force will likely be scrutinized further as donation disclosures are lodged with the Australian Electoral Commission.
As pre-polling continues ahead of 9 May, Farrer voters will weigh One Nation’s anti-establishment messaging against concerns about who ultimately pulls the strings – or provides the wings – for the party’s ambitions.
Jack Arnold is a retired academic polymath who commenced his professional career as a research scientist and ended as a lawyer, with too many decades of education between. To stay busy he has taken an active interest in all levels of local New England politics for the past 50 years, assisting in the election of three progressive candidates, the latter two being very busy Independent representatives for their communities.
Since the retirement of these politicians in 2013, New England has stagnated economically and socially with pre-selected Nationals being elected to Parliaments in the strange local belief that voting for 19th century ideals would yield the new government infrastructure projects that our kids will need to live in the electorates in this 21st century.
Regional Independents get things done for their communities.
What do Nationals, Liarbrals, ON do?? As little as possible for as long as they can.
Keep Independent Journalism Alive – Support The AIMN
Dear Reader,
Since 2013, The Australian Independent Media Network has been a fearless voice for truth, giving public interest journalists a platform to hold power to account. From expert analysis on national and global events to uncovering issues that matter to you, we’re here because of your support.
Running an independent site isn’t cheap, and rising costs mean we need you now more than ever. Your donation – big or small – keeps our servers humming, our writers digging, and our stories free for all.
Join our community of truth-seekers. Please consider donating now via:
PayPal or credit card – just click on the Donate button below
Direct bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969
We’ve also set up a GoFundMe as a dedicated reserve fund to help secure the future of our site.
Your support will go directly toward covering essential costs like web hosting renewals and helping us bring new features to life. Every contribution, no matter the size, helps us keep improving and growing.
Thank you for standing with us – we truly couldn’t do this without you.
With gratitude, The AIMN Team
Surely the real question should be that the tax system is so biased in rewarding high earners so that they can afford to make political decisions to gain even more influence.
Anybody who can’t see that Hanson has become the mouthpiece of mining magnates is stupid or willfully ignorant!
Some Ludicrous Undereducated Tart, P Hanson, is in anything for money off us, notice by us, existence through us. Like a choking turd, she is just passing through. Who would vote for a money maggot, a wilful dunce?
Gina Rinehart’s One Nation plaything
The SMH 300426 has an interesting viewpoint (paywall):
https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/why-one-nation-candidate-david-farley-s-political-journey-doesn-t-add-up-20260429-p5zrx0.html
As a New England voter subjected to Barnaby Joyce for 13 years of self-serving political inactivity, I speculate that the answer is much simpler.
Perhaps ON required a ”credible” pre-selected candidate and Barnaby thought of his good mate, the near retirement, 69-year-old, former agricultural executive and political aspirant, Mr David Farley.
Perhaps the conversation went something like: “Well there is not much to it, David. A nice easy step into retirement from an about $230,000 per year plus perks job for three years. I have done it for 13 years in New England and made about $3,000,000.00 without doing anything for the electorate”.
However, the huge needs of the Farrer voters are thanks to decades of political under-representation by successive Nationals MPs. This has created:
1) a desperate need for Health infrastructure and services;
2) unwanted forced amalgamation of state schools;
3) roads degrading due to heavy transport vehicles;
4) limited/no government subsidised public transport to the world.
The voters in Farrer deserve a young, energetic, educated, family orientated MP to demand the federal Parliament live up to the metropolitan standards of living in these regional centres, rather than more of the ”same old, same old” do nothing for the voters conservative politics.
The future belongs to the young rather than a geriatric Boomer seeking more financial advantages for his retirement.
Hanson and her parasitic worm offsider are like The Donald. It has always been about the truckloads of cash (no doubt all stashed in offshore accounts) they can grab and grift out of the public troughs, kissing the arses of big donors and playacting about caring for the unwashed masses as they hand over money.
My understanding is that corporate donations will from July 2026 be reuired to be disclosed in real-time and will be limited to a maximum of $50,000.
According to this article the Hancock interests are donating $500,000 each from Ian Plimer (executive director of Hancock Energy) and Adam Giles (head of Hancock Agriculture and former Northern Territory chief minister). Both men are senior executives at companies owned by Australia’s richest person, Gina Rinehart.
Additionally, as of April 2026, Gina Rinehart has gifted a new Cirrus G7 private plane, valued at over $1.5 million, to Pauline Hanson’s One Nation party. This donation is part of a broader, major funding boost for the party, which also included an additional $2 million in cash from her close associates.
So is Gina just getting in while there are no limits or has she actually bought One Nation ?
Lady Lardibotti the fat frau of the west can scrape, pock, hole, cut and slice Australia under rotten old law and shove the proceeds almost entirely down the humungous stepins. A plane? Anything for fun and graft for the crimmy crawly broom pilot. B Joyce can lie comfortably flat in the aisle with a designer chunderport, pressurised of course. ( a novel variation on cropdusting)
The rise of One Nation to prominence is no coincidence. It is all part of Zionist Israevil to use a dumb, easily manipulated, supporter of Zionist Israel (Hanson) to further the skilful takeover of Australian Politics by the Zionists.
Israevil has been infiltrating politics world wide for decades. Now completely controlling the USA politics and military and Trump.
AUSTRALIA IS NEXT!! And it has already started!.
The following are just a few examples.
Look what is happening already with the Jillian Seagel/Zionist agenda and a sudden unwarranted expensive Royal Commission into anti semitism to placate the Zionist Lobby.
Inviting of the war criminal President Hertzog to visit Australia, causing huge discourse.
The Head of ASIO married to an Israeli citizen and the ASIO/ Zionist orchestration of the expulsion of the Iranian Ambassador.
The Zionist silencing agenda eg. manipulation of the ABC to get Antionette Latouff sacked, the shutdown of the Adelaide writers festival, the illegal anti protest laws in NSW to protect the Hertzog. (look up NSW Premier Minns history with Zionist Israel). Qld laws making legitimate pro Palestine non violent slogans a criminal offence.
The next step is installing a puppet political party with eg the balance of power to politically control Australia on behalf of Zionist Israel.
That party is ONE NATION! and the devisive pro Israevil, pro Trump hag contolling it!
WAKE UP AUSTRAKIA BEFORE ITS TOO LATE! You are being minipulated by a murdering, war mongering, genicidal foreign power.
I have a confession: I know Adam Giles. We were friends, having worked together at ATSIC and then at the Department of Employment and Workplace Relations. After he left the public service he went over to the dark side.
If he’s got that much money to throw around I might ask him for a job. 😁
The ABC considers this Farrer bye-election is a two horse event with the conservative vote swapping preferences to exclude the credible young family lady Independent, Michelle Milthorpe.
Preferring a PHONey Puppet of the billionaire’s club is unlikely to fix anything in Farrer, especially government infrastructure spending and the abysmal water policy. The Farley name is establishment agriculture, AACo management is establishment agriculture, so changing the present water policy favouring establishment agriculture is unlikely without Independent Milthorpe.
The future belongs to the young – a local educated, credible, young, family lady INDEPENDENT MICHELLE MILTHORPE rather than a 69 year old geriatric ”any party will do” unthinking conservative seeking a cushy about $220,000 per year Parliament job before sliding into retirement.
Regardless, everybody – get out and cast a formal vote on 9 May 2026.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-05-01/race-for-farrer-shines-light-on-australian-politics/106613258
NEC,
The ABC has been well and truly Rupertised, so it’s no surprise that their politics is right wing (even if they try to deny it).
More than ever, there are defective candidates, policies (hah), attitudes, voting intentions, media garbage and indifference to basic sense, that one sees less hope and progress coming, even in dreams; sad. The ABC is now maggoty sick.
I think Clive Palmer spent $120,000,000 directly on his 2022 campaign.
Another $60,000,000 in 2025.
He didn’t win a single seat on either occasion.
Was spending of about $10,000 per vote he received?
The issue is that there is significant public disaffection with the major political parties. This is a major cause of the One Nation popularity, it is not simply the funding by narrow interests.
There are complex societal problems and the major parties have been unable or unwilling to address them to the satisfaction of parts of the electorate.
Crime and housing costs for example are complex, but not insoluable.
But the bogans are attracted to bogan policies.
By all means disclose and cap donations, but Clive Palmer has proven that huge spending does not result in electoral success
Who’s going to vote for nihlism? Seems the seat of Farrer are good to go.
I have come up with the new official rebrand of Hansons party: Gina Rinehart’s One Nation Kindergarten, which for the bogans will be the easy to remember cavwman acronym: GRONK.