An ambassador who calls dead journalists terrorists. A death penalty for Palestinians only. A government that says nothing. And a Press Club that provides the stage.
I. The Spectacle
On March 31, 2026, the National Press Club of Australia hosted Dr Hillel Newman, the newly appointed ambassador of Israel, for an address titled “Reshaping the Middle East.”
What unfolded was not diplomacy. It was propaganda. It was the marketing of genocide. And it was allowed to continue, uninterrupted, on Australian soil, under the lights of an institution that once stood for journalistic integrity.
Newman rejected a figure of 70,000 dead in Gaza – a number, he said, provided by Hamas. He claimed the ratio of civilian to combatant casualties was “the lowest in urban warfare” and that Israel should be “commended” for the “low number of uninvolved civilians that were actually killed.”
He was speaking over the bodies of 70,000 people. He was speaking over the findings of a United Nations commission of inquiry that, in September last year, found that Israel had committed genocide in the Gaza Strip – accusing the nation of having committed four genocidal acts, “namely killing, causing serious bodily or mental harm, deliberately inflicting conditions of life calculated to bring about the destruction of the Palestinians in whole or in part, and imposing measures intended to prevent births.”
The Press Club did not challenge him. The journalists in the room did not walk out. The broadcast continued.
II. The Death Penalty Law
On March 30, the Israeli Knesset passed a law imposing the death penalty for terrorism-related offences. Human Rights Watch has analysed the bill and found it explicitly discriminatory.
The law makes death by hanging the default punishment for West Bank Palestinians convicted of nationalistic killings. It also gives Israeli courts the option of imposing the death penalty on Israeli citizens convicted on similar charges – language that legal experts say effectively confines those who can be sentenced to death to Palestinian citizens of Israel and excludes Jewish citizens.
Within the military court system of the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the bill imposes the death penalty for killings classified as acts of terrorism as defined under Israeli law, even without a prosecutorial request. The bill only allows courts to order life imprisonment in unspecified exceptional cases where “special reasons” are found, limiting judicial discretion. It also prohibits commutation of sentences and mandates execution within an accelerated timeframe of 90 days.
Israeli citizens and residents are explicitly excluded from this provision: military jurisdiction applies exclusively to Palestinians, while Israeli settlers are tried in civilian courts.
Human Rights Watch has noted that military trials of Palestinians have “an approximately 96% conviction rate, based largely on ‘confessions’ extracted under duress and torture during interrogations.”
Adam Coogle, deputy Middle East director at Human Rights Watch, stated: “Israeli officials argue that imposing the death penalty is about security, but in reality, it entrenches discrimination and a two-tiered system of justice, both hallmarks of apartheid. The death penalty is irreversible and cruel. Combined with its severe restrictions on appeals and its 90-day execution timeline, this bill aims to kill Palestinian detainees faster and with less scrutiny.”
The Palestinian Authority has condemned the law as a “war crime” and a “flagrant violation of international humanitarian law, particularly the Fourth Geneva Convention, which guarantees protection for individuals and fair trial rights.”
At the Press Club, Newman defended the law. “Just like in the United States, in Japan and in India, which have capital punishment, Israel has the right, as a sovereign state, to decide … capital punishment,” he said.
He did not mention the discrimination. He did not mention the 96% conviction rate. He did not mention the torture.
III. The Journalists
Newman was asked about the killing of journalists in Gaza and Lebanon. The International Federation of Journalists has reported that 261 journalists and media workers have been killed in Gaza since October 7, 2023. The Committee to Protect Journalists has accused Israel of killing a record 129 journalists in 2025.
Newman’s response was chilling.
He claimed that two of three journalists killed in an Israeli air strike in Lebanon were “100 per cent terrorist” members of Hezbollah’s elite Radwan force. He said they were “dressed up as journalists.” He claimed that both Hamas and Hezbollah “disguise themselves as press and remain terrorist operatives.”
When pressed on what percentage of killed journalists were not terrorists, he admitted: “The honest truth is that we have no way of knowing the exact amount of journalists who weren’t 100 per cent journalists who were killed.”
He has no way of knowing. Yet he called them terrorists anyway. On Australian soil. At the National Press Club.
The Committee to Protect Journalists has previously described such accusations as “smear campaigns” without “credible evidence to substantiate their claims.”
Newman also dismissed the broader death toll of journalists, saying: “When people outside quote 250, 300 journalists [have been killed], what they’re doing is they’re just buying [it] hook, line and sinker. If they would check, they would find that the majority of all the journalists, so-called journalists, that were affected were actually activists guised as journalists.”
He has no evidence. He provided none. The Press Club did not ask for it.
IV. The Frankcom Family
While Newman spoke inside the Press Club, the family of Zomi Frankcom stood outside.
Frankcom, an Australian aid worker, was killed by an Israeli drone strike on April 1, 2024, while working for World Central Kitchen in Gaza. Seven aid workers died. The convoy was struck three times.
Two years later, the family is still waiting for justice. They are still waiting for the release of critical drone footage audio that would establish motive. Former Defence Force chief Mark Binskin, who conducted an independent inquiry, was given access to unedited drone footage – but it did not include audio.
Newman was asked repeatedly whether the Israeli government would apologise to the Frankcom family. He refused. “Every incident of an innocent person or aid worker that is affected by a war situation is tragic, and we’ve expressed full sympathy with the family,” he said.
Sympathy. Not an apology.
He said reparations were “dependent on the final outcome of the interrogation.” Two years later, the interrogation is still not final.
Mal Frankcom, Zomi’s brother, said the family would like a formal apology, but he believed this was unlikely because it “could be seen as an admission of guilt.”
He met with Prime Minister Anthony Albanese on Tuesday. He urged the government to use all possible diplomatic levers to pressure Israel to complete its investigation.
The ambassador was asked about the audio. He said: “That’s not in my hands. It’s in the IDF’s hands.”
The IDF’s hands. Where it has been for two years.
V. The Australian Government’s Response
Foreign Minister Penny Wong told the Labor caucus that Australia opposes the death penalty “in all instances.” She pointed to a joint statement Australia signed alongside France, Germany, Italy and the United Kingdom that opposed the measure.
The statement said: “We are particularly worried about the de facto discriminatory character of the bill. The adoption of this bill would risk undermining Israel’s commitments with regards to democratic principles.”
A joint statement. Words. Not action.
The government has not summoned the ambassador. It has not imposed sanctions. It has not suspended military cooperation. It has not done anything that would cost Israel anything at all.
The same government that rushed to pass hate speech laws after the Bondi terror attack – laws that criminalise the phrase “from the river to the sea” – has nothing to say about a law that would execute Palestinian prisoners by hanging within 90 days, with no right of pardon, under a discriminatory legal regime.
The same government that welcomed Israeli President Isaac Herzog to Canberra has not condemned the man who wore a noose-shaped lapel pin while celebrating the passage of this law – Itamar Ben-Gvir, Israel’s National Security Minister.
The same government that expelled Iran’s ambassador after ASIO concluded Tehran orchestrated the bombings of a synagogue and a kosher restaurant has not applied the same standard to Israel.
VI. The Question of Double Standards
In 2024, the Albanese government expelled Iran’s ambassador, Ahmad Sadeghi, after domestic spy agency ASIO concluded that Iran had orchestrated the bombings of a synagogue in Melbourne and a kosher restaurant in Sydney.
A top Iranian diplomat, Mohammad Pournajaf, defected from the regime and was granted asylum in Australia. The government acted. The ambassador was expelled.
Yet Israel’s ambassador calls dead journalists terrorists, defends a discriminatory death penalty law, refuses to apologise for the killing of an Australian aid worker – and the government says nothing.
Why was the Iranian ambassador expelled, but the Israeli ambassador remains?
The answer is the network. The donors. The lobbyists. The fear of being labelled antisemitic. The capture of our political class by a foreign ideology that demands silence in exchange for support.
VII. Has the Press Club Been Captured?
The National Press Club is meant to be a forum for robust journalism. For challenging those in power. For holding the powerful to account.
On March 31, 2026, it provided a platform for an ambassador who called dead journalists terrorists. Who defended a discriminatory death penalty law. Who refused to apologise for the killing of an Australian aid worker.
The journalists in the room did not walk out. They did not cut the microphone. They did not refuse to platform a man who accused the dead of being terrorists without evidence.
This does no credit to Australian journalism. It does no credit to the Press Club. It does no credit to Australia.
VIII. The Questions They Refuse to Ask
We will ask the questions they refuse to ask:
- Why was Hillel Newman given a platform to call dead journalists terrorists?
- Why did the National Press Club not challenge his claims in real time?
- Why has the Australian government not summoned the ambassador to answer for the death penalty law?
- Why has the government not condemned the law in the strongest possible terms?
- Why has the government not suspended military cooperation with Israel?
- Why has the government not imposed sanctions?
- Why has the government done nothing that would cost Israel anything at all?
- Why was the Iranian ambassador expelled, but the Israeli ambassador remains?
The Frankcom family deserves answers. The Palestinian prisoners facing execution deserve the world to speak. The Australian people deserve to know why their government is silent.
IX. The Larger Pattern
This is not an isolated incident. It is the same pattern we have been exposing for weeks.
The same network that brought us the Segal Plan – mandatory Zionist indoctrination in universities. The same network that brought us the police crackdown in New South Wales – eight armoured officers breaking down a woman’s door at 5am. The same network that is turning our public service into an arm of foreign influence. The same network that has captured our political class.
The same silence. The same complicity. The same refusal to act.
Israel is committing genocide. The International Court of Justice has found it “plausible.” The United Nations commission of inquiry has found it has committed genocidal acts. The world is watching.
And Australia says nothing. Or says a few words in a joint statement, then returns to business as usual.
X. What Must Be Done
- The National Press Club must answer for its decision to platform Newman. Why was he not challenged? Why was the broadcast allowed to continue? Why were dead journalists slandered without evidence on Australian soil?
- The Australian government must summon the ambassador. He must answer for the death penalty law. He must answer for his comments about journalists. He must answer for the Frankcom family.
- The government must condemn the death penalty law in the strongest possible terms. A joint statement is not enough. Words are not enough. Australia must use every diplomatic lever to oppose this discriminatory, inhumane legislation.
- The government must suspend military cooperation with Israel. Australia cannot claim to oppose the death penalty while cooperating militarily with a state that imposes it discriminatorily.
- The government must impose sanctions. The time for words is over. The time for action is now.
- The Frankcom family must receive justice. The audio must be released. The investigation must be completed. Those responsible must be held accountable.
XI. A Warning
What happened at the National Press Club on March 31, 2026, was not an aberration. It was the logical conclusion of a pattern.
A foreign ambassador called dead journalists terrorists. He defended a law that executes Palestinians by hanging within 90 days, with no right of pardon, under a discriminatory legal regime. He refused to apologise for the killing of an Australian aid worker.
And Australia was silent. The government was silent. The Press Club was silent. The media was silent.
This is what complicity looks like. Not active participation. Silence. The refusal to speak. The refusal to act. The refusal to hold accountable those who commit atrocities in our name, with our support, under the cover of our alliance.
The wire is not cut. The shells fall short. The men who send others to die do not walk the ground.
But we will not be silent. We will ask the questions they refuse to ask. We will name the names. We will expose the pattern.
And we will keep cutting the wire until there is nothing left but the garden.
This article is dedicated to my wife, who stands with me shoulder to shoulder, and I am so proud of her.
Sources:
- The Sydney Morning Herald, “Australia politics LIVE: Israeli ambassador addresses National Press Club,” March 31, 2026 (Page now closed).
- News.com.au, “‘100 per cent terrorist’: Ambassador’s shock claim,” March 31, 2026
- Human Rights Watch, “Israel: Discriminatory Death Penalty Bill Passes,” March 31, 2026
- The Sydney Morning Herald, “‘We have expressed sympathy’: Israeli ambassador declines to apologise for Zomi Frankcom killing,” March 31, 2026
- The Age, “Top Iranian diplomat defected, received asylum in secret escape,” March 12, 2026
- The Nightly, “Mohammad Pournajaf: Senior Iranian diplomat defects from Tehran regime…,” March 12, 2026
- Bernama, “Israeli law for death penalty for Palestinians ‘war crime’: Palestine,” March 31, 2026
- The Guardian, “Zomi Frankcom’s brother demands audio of deadly Israeli strike…,” March 31, 2026
- SBS Australia, “Israeli ambassador rejects plea from Zomi Frankcom’s family…,” March 31, 2026
Keep Independent Journalism Alive – Support The AIMN
Dear Reader,
Since 2013, The Australian Independent Media Network has been a fearless voice for truth, giving public interest journalists a platform to hold power to account. From expert analysis on national and global events to uncovering issues that matter to you, we’re here because of your support.
Running an independent site isn’t cheap, and rising costs mean we need you now more than ever. Your donation – big or small – keeps our servers humming, our writers digging, and our stories free for all.
Join our community of truth-seekers. Please consider donating now via:
PayPal or credit card – just click on the Donate button below
Direct bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969
We’ve also set up a GoFundMe as a dedicated reserve fund to help secure the future of our site.
Your support will go directly toward covering essential costs like web hosting renewals and helping us bring new features to life. Every contribution, no matter the size, helps us keep improving and growing.
Thank you for standing with us – we truly couldn’t do this without you.
With gratitude, The AIMN Team
The NPC’s platforming of Hillel is not unusual but in the context of its recent uninviting of Chris Hedges seems to display a disconcertingly pro-Israel stance. I did not see the broadcast so can’t comment on the assembled media’s response but perhaps those who oppose Israel’s genocide in Gaza boycotted the address.i find it hard to believe that none of his lies were challenged. Perhaps this article will elicit a response from somebody. Otherwise I agree with all of your demands. Hillel should be expelled. I think there is ample evidence that ASIO is in thrall to Mossad as the Labor Government is in thrall to (or terrified of) the Zionist lobby.
As far as I’m concerned, Newman can piss off back to Israel – we don’t need him or his ilk here in Australia.
The Zionist lobby has a vice like grip on the jelly-backed Albanese government.The criminal governments of the US and Israel are reaping the rewards of their psychopathic “leaders”.
The weakness of our “leaders” will ensure we share in the retribution, as is already evident.
The Janus-faced Jewish agitators who never tire of chasing down and harassing, criticising, vilifying, condemning, and in many cases, destroying their critics want, of course, as such is their ilk, to have it both ways. To be free to criticise, and to be free from criticism. To them it is anathema that global citizens should find their Middle-Eastern behaviours abhorrent, atrocious, inhumane, satanic, hellish; they would argue, to the contrary, it is necessary that they destroy their foes who, unless they do, will destroy them instead.
The alternative, that of peaceful rapprochement, of atonement for sins committed, of appropriate reparation for lands stolen, livelihoods destroyed, peoples killed, never seems to occur to them, to take traction, instead, the reach for the gun or missile is the reflexive option, and always the first and only approach, and woe betide anyone brave or foolish enough to criticise the brutalist policy of the only solution being spilled blood and guts and further generation of enmity & hatred. Janus-faced indeed, with hearts of stone.
First Albanese and Wong support Israel’s right to defend itself as Israel massacres unarmed Gazan citizens and bombs Beirut. Then we invite Israel President Herzog (who adds his signature to artillery shells aimed at Gaza) to satisfy the craven Zionist lobby. Next we allow the Israeli Ambassador to lecture us on geopolitical morality. What’s next?
Little doubt about it ….. the NO-GO-ALBO LABOR government has sold out the Australian voters to the ”political donations” of the professional whingers, the ZIONAZI elements of Judaism followers.
Doubtless there will be Australian ”investors” in the re-building of the GAZA GOLD COAST Project promoted by TACO Trumpery’s ”Board of Land Theft”. Should these ”investors” be identified then they should be expported out of Australia as undeserving of Australian citizenship.
Perhaps ON has some use …. LABOR could ”steal” their policies for removing undesirable foreign borne persons for no good reason except being supporters of dispossession, displacement & genocide of Indigenous Palestinian land owners.
Thank you, Andrew Klein, for an essential article superbly articulated. I take exception with tarring the “political class” with the same brush on this issue, the Greens have stood against the actions of Israel for years and certainly throughout the escalation in Israel’s genocide of the Palestinians after Oct 7th, and likely the socialist parties and some independents such as Andrew Wilkie.
The reason I raise that is that it is important to me that we keep in mind that there are alternatives to Labor, One Nation, the Coalition.
For more critical analysis and debunking of the lies propagated by Isreal’s ambassador:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8pvEzISJS8s beginning at 15:50 mins
Superstitious fools are rotten to the core with brainless unproven lying myth and fantasy, dead to sense and decency, riddled with supremacist drives, ready to claim the insolent absurdity of high status, chosen, being promised a land, when no such right exists. So murder and theft, lying insincerity, utterly uncivilised brainless egofixation swells. We must fight this rancid rubbish for any hope of decency and progress or the swine hordes of insane superstitious drives will continue the lying. None of these nongs has seen a god ever, for there is NONE. No proof, just criminality.
Larissa Waters on the decision to platform a blatant Israeli propagandist.
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/r9raHmPCqeM
Our ABC has platformed the Israel ambassador’s propaganda in a disgraceful puff piece.
“Israel’s ambassador defends new death penalty for Palestinians”
I won’t even link it as that would be contributing to the platforming. But the article simply shares quotes from what he said, without any factchecking or analysis.
Aunty has had her bloomers pulled down by the former Newscorpse employees who now work there.The Dirty Digger has had his way without having to fork out any loot.
If Aunty was a lady of the night, she’d be screaming blue murder.Of course, the Australian public has been dudded again by a succession of criminally gutless politicians.
Shocking. Where was the major media coverage about this?
If there was ever any doubt that the Australian government and media establishment are thorough Zionist lobby toadies and sycophants, this Israeli psychopath surely blew it away.
@ Harry Lime, Max Gross: Agreed. The unsubtle undermining of OUR ABC in pursuit of the Sir Keith Murdoch objective of ”killing off government sponsored news” has been implemented by mainly COALition government recruiting of FRW scribblers trained in the Murdoch Media Manipulation Monopoly.
Too many of these now ABC ”presenters” use ”yellow journalism” methods as a matter of natural practice, possibly because they aspire to be members of the ”ruling elite” but lack the necessary social connections to become part of the A-List party goers.
So is this another example of the need for aspiring parents to send their kids to private schools where administrative desk jockeys earn more than the PM??
The age old Oz “She’ll be right, mate.” was always wrought out of a collaboration of ignorance and laziness. After all, who’d want to piss into the wind of the oppressive, greedy and powerful govts, institutions and extractors? If inextricably troubled, simply go on the lam.
Now however, that old Oz gutlessness has been converted to the era of the great toady ‘rub-off’. Failing competence and ingenuity? No worries, just stand close to oligarchs and despots to get a rub-off. Or in the alternative tart up as a celebrity.
When confronted by stark reality, point the other way, or exercise performative silence and self-launder the filth.
When considering Australias foreign Minister Dr.Evatt in the Chifley government of 1947 who played a major role in the foundation of the International Declaration of Human Rights there does not appear to be any resemblance to the current ALP’s policy.
“The fear of being labelled antisemitic”…et voila! the chickens have come home to roost, petard-wise!
And now the lily-livered have rendered us complicit by hosting the representative of a sadistic hanging regime where rapid-fire machine guns are the expeditious weapons of choice in genocide.
A gruelling read, thank you Dr Klein.
“The government must suspend military cooperation with Israel. Australia cannot claim to oppose the death penalty while cooperating militarily with a state that imposes it discriminatorily.”
You mean like USAnia, but worse?
How the hell does Jilian Segal, and David Gonski keep their noses in the trough?
https://johnmenadue.com/post/2026/04/national-press-club-under-fire-for-disgraceful-invitation-to-israeli-envoy/?
And its high time that we the people told Albo to get stuffed….
https://johnmenadue.com/post/2026/04/a-culture-of-secrecy-is-taking-hold-in-canberra/?