By Walt Zlotow
Chicago Tribune’s (my local paper) support of Trump’s Gaza peace plan ignores major flaw… no call for a Palestinian state.
Everyone should join the Chicago Tribune’s hope for an end to the 2 year Israeli genocidal ethnic cleansing of 2,300,000 Palestinians in Gaza. In its editorial, ‘Why we support Trump’s proposal for peace in Gaza between Israel and Hamas’, the Trib called Trump’s 20 point plan “substantive”, not “Trump’s prior musings about U.S. control of Gaza or fanciful talk of Trump-branded resorts.”
The Trib’s substantive claim does not include creation of a Palestinian state, an entity recognized by 157 of the UN’s 193 countries (81%), but not the US. Israel’s 2 yearlong destruction of Gaza and gobbling up their West Bank land with hundreds of thousands of Israeli settlers, makes Palestinian statehood impossible.
Creation of a Palestinian state should be recognized by the US and made Point 1 of Trump’s 20 point plan. But one must scroll down to point 19 before gleaning even a hint of a Palestinian state far in the future:
19. While Gaza re-development advances and when the PA reform programme is faithfully carried out, the conditions may finally be in place for a credible pathway to Palestinian self-determination and statehood, which we recognise as the aspiration of the Palestinian people.
If there was any doubt this precludes a Palestinian state, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu affirmed after release of the plan that it did not call for a Palestinian state. To show his disdain for the plan, Netanyahu ignored Trump’s demand Friday to immediately cease bombing the now obliterated Gaza by killing over 190 Palestinians over the 3-day weekend.
The US should cease being an outlier by becoming country 158 to recognize the state of Palestine. It should further cut off all military aid to Israel until it enters into serious negotiations with both Hamas and the Palestinian Authority (the rulers of Gaza and West Bank respectively) to create a Palestinian state that will live in peace with neighboring Israel. That is precisely what Trump’s proposed International Stabilization Force (ISF) should be tasked with.
That, and not the Trump peace plan that likely precludes there ever being a Palestinian state, would truly be substantive.
Walt Zlotow, West Suburban Peace Coalition, Glen Ellyn IL
Keep Independent Journalism Alive – Support The AIMN
Dear Reader,
Since 2013, The Australian Independent Media Network has been a fearless voice for truth, giving public interest journalists a platform to hold power to account. From expert analysis on national and global events to uncovering issues that matter to you, we’re here because of your support.
Running an independent site isn’t cheap, and rising costs mean we need you now more than ever. Your donation – big or small – keeps our servers humming, our writers digging, and our stories free for all.
Join our community of truth-seekers. Donate via PayPal or credit card via the button below, or bank transfer [BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969] and help us keep shining a light.
With gratitude,
The AIMN Team
Nowhere in Trump’s 20 point proposal is there any guarantee for Palestinians to legally resume title and occupation of the properties, whether residential, commercial, agricultural and/or industrial that existed legally prior to 1967.
Trump, at Netanyahu’s insistence, is confirming that Palestinians will never be able to exist independently, let alone co-exist, within lands controlled by Israel.
An article by Stuart Rees in todays Pearls and Irritations on the history of this conflict,gives a much more accurate overview of the horrors perpetrated on Palestinians for more than a century.
Nothing Netanyahu or Trump says is worth two knobs of goat shit.
The Zionists will resume normal transmission(genocide) the minute they invent the next pretext.
The would- be Nobel Peace Prize recipient should not crank up a welter of self congratulation,as he has been played for the idiot that he is.
The Donald does not deserve the prize this year. Trump being Trump won’t like the thought of maybe having to wait until 2026. Let’s see how long his vaunted ceasefire (and that’s all I consider it to be) lasts before nominating him. If, and that’s a big if, it holds for, at the very least, three months then that’s a plus. I’m going to be surprised if it lasts a couple of months before one side or the other triggers it all off again.