In December 2022, 16 year-old Will Shackel started a “charity” – Nuclear For Australia, funded by entrepreneur Dick Smith. It’s a “fact-filled” “grassroots” movement, devoted to champion the cause of “clean reliable” nuclear energy for Australia. It’s not a lobby group for the nuclear industry – Oh no! – even if its leaders are Dr ADi Paterson, with his career in the industry, and Tony Irwin, Technical Director of SMR Nuclear Technology Pty Ltd. It’s not political, oh no! even if its goal happens to be identical with the policy campaign goal of the Liberal Coalition Party for the coming Federal Election.
But, just by coincidence, in this election year, Nuclear for Australia is touting not just young Will Shackel, but also 24 year old American Grace Stanke. And these are the nuclear propaganda big guns for 2025.
Why do I call them the “big guns?
After all, Australia has some very experienced nuclear experts, happy to tell us how great nuclear power is. There are not only Dr Paterson, and Mr Irwin. There are Ziggy Switkowski, Michael Angwin, the expert staff of the Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, and the Australian Uranium Association. Well, the thing is they are the old-style big guns, who will spout their expert facts at length, and in detail.
In the new Trumpian era, it’s not enough to know the facts, and perhaps, not even necessary.
What is now important is the person who is touting nuclear power. Is he, and preferably she, young, attractive, warm, enthusiastic, and easy to understand?
Actually, the Australian nuclear lobby has recognised this for a while. They previously promoted the rather wacky young nuclear spruikers Zion Lights and Isodope (Yes – those really are their names).
Zion and Isodope did their best. But what Australia needs, seems to be young people who are bright and attractive, and with appeal not just to the young, but across the generations – knowledgeable, likeable, but not rebellious.
Polls always show that in Australia, women are less supportive of nuclear power than men are. With compulsory voting, it’s always important for the parties campaigning to pay attention to the opinions of women. So it’s especially important for the nuclear lobby to appeal to women.
Young Will Shackel was a good propagandist over 2023-34, articulate, enthusiastic, and good-looking. But in this election year, what is needed is a female propagandist, an appealing model for young women, and also attractive to men, and acceptable to older generations.
Enter Grace Stanke
Grace Stanke is an attractive, articulate, accomplished young woman – a classical violinist, a water-skier, Miss America 2023 – and a nuclear engineer. She graduated in 2023, and went to work full time as Nuclear Engineer and Nuclear Energy advocate at Constellation Energy.
I can’t help admiring Grace Stanke for her achievements, and for her apparently very sincere motivation. She is grateful to nuclear medicine, for helping her father who had cancer, and she believes that climate change must be addressed, by replacing fossil fuels. And she’s obviously very bright, and knows her stuff about nuclear technology.
Still, for thoughtful people there’s a problem with Grace as a nuclear proponent. This is the fact that it doesn’t seem to matter that she knows her nuclear stuff. I have watched several video interviews with her, some remarkably long, and she was not called upon to answer the hard questions. The interviewers seem focussed on her career in beauty pageants, and her year as Miss America. The interviews have a happy positive tone, rejoicing in her success as a young woman and a mentor for girls. No need to get down and dirty about the insidious spread of ionising radiation, toxic wastes, the effects of the industry on the health of uranium miners and other workers and communities.
And this what we’re up against in the new age of Trumpic spin – short, bright messages – purveyed by attractive young people. Marshall McCluhan predicted it decades ago – The Medium is the Massage. It’s usually written as “Message”, but I think that his original wording was more accurate.
Grace Stanke has been travelling around the world, promoting the nuclear industry, including to the Climate Summit Cop 29, and even before graduating, was named the “New Face of Nuclear Energy” by the Wall Street Journal.
I feel that it is incorrect to call people like Grace Stanke and Will Shackel the “big guns”. That suggests a sort of aggressive, forceful propaganda. And that’s not their style. They’re so sincere, and squeaky clean and nice. It will be interesting, but unlikely, if Grace Stanke has to worry about any tough questioning in Australia. After all, that wouldn’t be courteous to a visiting Miss America.
See also: Nuclear waste springs eternal in the human folly
Dear reader, we need your support
Independent sites such as The AIMN provide a platform for public interest journalists. From its humble beginning in January 2013, The AIMN has grown into one of the most trusted and popular independent media organisations.
One of the reasons we have succeeded has been due to the support we receive from our readers through their financial contributions.
With increasing costs to maintain The AIMN, we need this continued support.
Your donation – large or small – to help with the running costs of this site will be greatly appreciated.
You can donate through PayPal or credit card via the button below, or donate via bank transfer: BSB: 062500; A/c no: 10495969
Brainlessness, attention seeking, ambitious, benighted, undereducated, (despite accomplishments), Skull leached, USA cultured, unaware, non economics focussed, silly.
Nuclear power generation is utterly stupid, irresponsible, uneconomic, unsupportable, a toy of ignorant greedites, profiteers, cynical stupidos, egoturdites and savages. No bikini, election, media blitz or torrent of lies will change that Right Wing Filth.
Will Shackel should look back at this period in his life and feel cringe. He is a loud voice that knows little.
He got his enthusiasm from a primary school project on nuclear energy and then later a high school one, not for the science, but it was a commerce project.
On these very slender projects he has based this silly campaign and of course some big nuclear proponents seek to back him up. That makes it even worse.
Clearly, Dutton’s physicallity is not conducive to click bait, however bimboism remains a preferred attribute.
Yeah Shackel obviously does not know a real lot about nuclear energy except for a few basic facts. You hear him speak and it is just a whole lot of generalisations and other stuff like “we should go nuclear because it is much better”.
Basically he is 1% fact and 99$ generalisation, all fluff and no substance.
As for her, well her name is appropriate because everything she says “stankes”.
Indeed a grasping wrong-thinking bimbo.
Trump used to own the Miss America pageant through the Miss Universe Org until 2015, then it was owned by WME/IMG (Endeavor Group) of Beverly Hills CA, talent agency and advertising agency conglomerate also involved in sports-betting. WME/IMG had a circus of owners and added subsidiaries and restructured its affairs more than it changed its socks. It grew mainly by strategic acquisitions, so of course attracted XMusk and other adventurers. Its dealings have attracted innumerable law suits and anti-trust actions. It sold in 2022 the Miss America pageant (Miss Universe Group) to Thai company JKN Global Group, which filed for bankruptcy in Nov2023.
So much for the adroitness of the erstwhile Miss America now grafting in Oz. It appears she’s always played to her perceived strengths – not nuclear or commerce, but as a desperate self-promoter with a manufactured demeanor – but her glib choices have lead her on a path associated with demise – a path she appears stuck on.
Dutts and the LNP will undoubtedly love her, she’s right up their bleak alley.